The Candid Eye

April 12, 2010

I will arrest Pope Benedict XVI : Richard Dawkins

RICHARD DAWKINS, the atheist campaigner, is planning a legal ambush to have the Pope arrested during his state visit to Britain “for crimes against humanity”.

Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, the atheist author, have asked human rights lawyers to produce a case for charging Pope Benedict XVI over his alleged cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic church.

Richard Dawkins : Image Courtesy - Times Online

The pair believe they can exploit the same legal principle used to arrest Augusto Pinochet, the late Chilean dictator, when he visited Britain in 1998.

The Pope was embroiled in new controversy this weekend over a letter he signed arguing that the “good of the universal church” should be considered against the defrocking of an American priest who committed sex offences against two boys. It was dated 1985, when he was in charge of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which deals with sex abuse cases.

Benedict will be in Britain between September 16 and 19, visiting London, Glasgow and Coventry, where he will beatify Cardinal John Henry Newman, the 19th-century theologian.

Dawkins and Hitchens believe the Pope would be unable to claim diplomatic immunity from arrest because, although his tour is categorised as a state visit, he is not the head of a state recognised by the United Nations.

Pope Benedict XVI

They have commissioned the barrister Geoffrey Robertson and Mark Stephens, a solicitor, to present a justification for legal action.The lawyers believe they can ask the Crown Prosecution Service to initiate criminal proceedings against the Pope, launch their own civil action against him or refer his case to the International Criminal Court.

Dawkins, author of The God Delusion, said: “This is a man whose first instinct when his priests are caught with their pants down is to cover up the scandal and damn the young victims to silence.”

Hitchens, author of God Is Not Great, said: “This man is not above or outside the law. The institutionalised concealment of child rape is a crime under any law and demands not private ceremonies of repentance or church-funded payoffs, but justice and punishment.”

Last year pro-Palestinian activists persuaded a British judge to issue an arrest warrant for Tzipi Livni, the Israeli politician, for offences allegedly committed during the 2008-09 conflict in Gaza. The warrant was withdrawn after Livni cancelled her planned trip to the UK.

“There is every possibility of legal action against the Pope occurring,” said Stephens. “Geoffrey and I have both come to the view that the Vatican is not actually a state in international law. It is not recognised by the UN, it does not have borders that are policed and its relations are not of a full diplomatic nature.”

Source: Times Online

Advertisements

January 11, 2010

Almost half of Britons would oppose mosque being built in their area, finds study

The majority of the population believe that Britain is divided by religion, a Government-backed inquiry has found.And around half of people believe that religious diversity has had a negative impact on the nation.

The warnings on the extent of the divide between Muslims and much of the rest of the country were produced by the British Social Attitudes survey, an annual study produced with funding from Whitehall.

Islamist clerics like Anjem Choudary and Douglas Murray have done nothing for the perception of Islam in the UK : Image Courtesy-http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

The study underlined the depth of suspicion about Islamic influence now held by many in Britain, finding that only one in four people feel positively about Islam.The figures also showed that more than half of the population would be strongly opposed to the building or opening of a mosque in their area.They follow signs in other Government research that majority attitudes against Islam are hardening and that tension over religion is increasing.

The latest findings, to be published in full later this month, come in the wake of the furore over extremist Anjem Choudary’s plan to hold a march of Islamists carrying coffins through Wootten Bassett to symbolise Muslims murdered by British forces.Although Muslim representative bodies have condemned the idea and individual Muslims have underlined their own respect for British soldiers, the Choudary stunt has provoked widespread anger and the risk of a backlash.

The British Social Attitudes findings also follow the Christmas Day airline bombing attempt by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, suspected to have been radicalised while he was president of the Islamic Society at University College London.The Abdulmuttallab plot has been followed by a new and disruptive wave of security checks for airline passengers.

The Social Attitudes Survey has been produced annually since the early 1980s by leading academics from a detailed poll of more than 4,000 people.It is followed closely by ministers and findings have been used, for example, to justify Government inaction to shore up the institution of marriage.

The latest findings will raise concern that the Government’s policy of producing ‘social cohesion’ by backing moderate Islam and isolating extremism is not working.Another half – 52 per cent – believe Britain is deeply divided along religious lines. Almost half – 45 per cent – reject the claim that diversity has brought benefits to the country.

They say that religious diversity has had a negative impact.Last month the Citizenship Survey produced by the Communities Department found that the proportion of the population which believes that Britain has a lot of religious prejudice has risen from fewer than a quarter to almost a third – 24 per cent to 31 per cent – since 2005.

It also found that nearly two thirds of people believe that religious prejudice has grown since the early years of the past decade.

Ministers have been anxious to appease resentment of Muslims and minority groups among less well-off and well-educated white people in recent months, fearing a backlash from one-time core Labour voters when the election comes in the spring.

However the British Social Attitudes findings suggest that unhappiness over the influence of Islam has spread beyond poor white areas and now concerns a majority of people.

Active protests over Islam have so far been confined to fringe groups. In September a far-right organisation calling itself the English Defence League staged a march that led to scuffles outside a new mosque in Harrow in North West London.

But there has been no evidence of anything more than occasional vandalism – of a kind similar to that experienced by churches and synagogues – against the great majority of the 300 mosques in England.

Source: DailyMail

December 30, 2009

A murderous ideology tolerated for too long

Filed under: Islam,Jihad,Terrorism,UK,Wahabism — thecandideye @ 6:00 AM
Tags: , , , ,

Jihadist Islamism is comparable to Nazism in many respects. The British public realises this; so do the intelligence services.

Friday’s attempt to blow up a transatlantic airliner by a British-educated Islamist was foiled by the bravery of its passengers and crew. We cannot assume that we will be lucky next time. And the indications are that there will be a next time. According to police sources, 25 British-born Muslims are currently in Yemen being trained in the art of bombing planes. But most of these terrorists did not acquire their crazed beliefs in the Islamic world: they were indoctrinated in Britain. Indeed, thousands of young British Muslims support the use of violence to further the Islamist cause – and this despite millions of pounds poured by the Government into projects designed to prevent Islamic extremism.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab : Image Courtesy - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

Is it time for a fundamental rethink of Britain’s attitude towards domestic Islamism? Consider this analogy. Suppose that, in several London universities, Right‑wing student societies were allowed to invite neo-Nazi speakers to address teenagers. Meanwhile, churches in poor white neighbourhoods handed over their pulpits to Jew-hating admirers of Adolf Hitler, called for the execution of homosexuals, preached the intellectual inferiority of women, and blessed the murder of civilians. What would the Government do? It would bring the full might of the criminal law against activists indoctrinating young Britons with an inhuman Nazi ideology – and the authorities that let them. Any public servants complicit in this evil would be hounded from their jobs.

Jihadist Islamism is also a murderous ideology, comparable to Nazism in many respects. The British public realises this; so do the intelligence services. Yet because it arises out of a worldwide religion – most of whose followers are peaceful – politicians and the public sector shrink from treating its ideologues as criminal supporters of violence. Instead, the Government throws vast sums of money at the Muslim community in order to ensure that what is effectively a civil war between extremists and moderates is won by the latter. This policy – supported by all the main political parties – does not seem to be working. The authorities, lacking specialist knowledge, sometimes turn for advice to “moderate” Muslims who have extreme sympathies; supporters of al-Qaeda are paid to disseminate their ideology to young people.

Radical Islamist leaders are not stupid: they know how to play this system. The indoctrination of students carries on under the noses of public servants who are terrified of being labelled Islamophobic or racist. Therefore they fail to do their duty, which is to protect Muslims and non-Muslims alike from a terrorist ideology. If providing that protection requires fewer “consultations” with “community leaders” and more arrests, then so be it.

December 19, 2009

What if we follow the footsteps of France??

France to launch national pride campaign in battle against Islamic fundamentalism.

France is to adopt a series of measures to ‘reaffirm pride’ in the country and combat Islamic fundamentalism.They include everybody receiving lessons in the nation’s Christian history and children singing the national anthem.

Using words which infuriated ethnic minority groups and Socialist opponents, immigration minister Eric Besson also said he wanted ‘foreigners to speak better French’.

Troops march down the Champs Elysees during the Bastille Day parade

Troops march down the Champs Elysees during the Bastille Day parade : Image Courtesy- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

He called for all recent arrivals to be monitored by ‘Republican godfathers’, charged with helping immigrants to integrate better.

His proposed measures contrast sharply with the situation in Britain where ‘citizenship education’ centres on multicultural diversity.

M Besson, who was born in the former French protectorate of Morocco, suggested a debate on national identity’ entitled ‘What does it mean to be French?’

He also reignited the debate about face and body-covering Muslim veils, saying they should definitely be banned.

As well as providing civic lessons for adults – including classes about the country’s Christian history and liberal political institutions – the government will encourage school children to sing the national anthem at least once a year.

His proposed measures contrast sharply with the situation in Britain where ‘citizenship education’ centres on multicultural diversity and the European Union, while ‘God Save The Queen’ is not even taught in schools.

In an interview broadcast on national TV, Mr Besson said : ‘It’s necessary to reaffirm the values of national identity and the pride of being French.

‘I think, for example, that it would be good for all young French people to have the chance to sing The Marseillaise at least once a year.’

Making clear that radical Islam was a threat, Mr Besson said: ‘In France, the nation and the republic remain the strongest ramparts against … fundamentalist tendencies. France is diversity, and France is unity.’

Nicolas Sarkozy with his immigration minister, then a political adviser, Eric Besson, left, in 2007

Nicolas Sarkozy with his immigration minister, then a political adviser, Eric Besson, left, in 2007 : Image Courtesy - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

Mr Besson defended a decision to send illegal Afghan immigrants – all of them Muslim – back to Kabul on charter flights organised in conjunction with the British government last week, saying there would be many more.

More than 21,000 people have been deported from France this year – with 27,000 the ultimate target, said Mr Besson.

He also reignited the debate about face and body-covering Muslim veils, saying they should definitely be banned.

‘For me, there should be no burqas on the street,’ said Mr Besson. ‘The burqa is against national values – an affront to women’s rights and equality.’

Explaining the apparent shift to the extreme right by President Nicolas Sarkozy’s government, Mr Besson evoked the legacy of Jean Marie Le Pen’s anti-immigration National Front party, which is struggling massively with huge debts and low electoral support.

Mr Besson said: ‘We should never have abandoned to the National Front a number of values which are part of the Republic’s heritage. I think that the political death of the National Front would be the best news for all of us.’

But Mohammed Moussaoui, a prominent French Muslim leader, said debates like the one about the burqa were stigmatising the country’s entire Muslim community, which at some five million is the largest in western Europe.

Blog at WordPress.com.